Re: A structured format for dates? from Roberto Polli on 2022-09-11 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2022)

From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 21:34:41 +0200
To: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAP9qbHU8U1gRLrKDCX5xm5+hZ_KankNxXWcdFK1HsbXetSotHw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Erik,


Il dom 11 set 2022, 21:30 Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> ha scritto:

>  it could be something
> along of the lines of recommending that:
>
> - the general recommendation for timestamps is to use SF-Date which is
> easy to parse and understand for machines.
>
> - if human-readability is a concern, then please use X (RFC 3339?) for
> timestamps.
>
>
It makes sense. +1

Have a nice day,
R

Received on Sunday, 11 September 2022 19:35:06 UTC