Re: Comments on draft-451-new-protocol-elements-01

The draft has TBDs for the geographical header. Part of the goal of
presenting this draft at httpbis wg  is to gain comments (such as yours!)
about what would be a good way to specify the header.

Thanks,
Shivan

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>    -  HTTP status code 451 is increasingly being used to deny access to
>       resources based on geographical IP.  The scope of this denial is
>       sometimes as finely scoped as a city or a province.  The response
>       SHOULD contain a provisional header with geographical scope of
>       block.
>
> This seems rather underspecified. What format should this information
> be in? I'm not an expert on this kind of thing, but perhaps you want
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5139
>
> -Ekr
>
>