Re: Frames that manipulate set-based peer state

Ah - so you're just suggesting a change in name, not semantics?


> On 19 Jul 2016, at 11:28 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 19 July 2016 at 11:27, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> a) indicating that, as of time of generation, the frames sent represent a complete set, but that it might be added to later
>> b) indicating that the set is complete for the rest of the lifetime of the connection
>> 
>> Correct?
> 
> No, I was trying to avoid the implication that the frame contains ALL
> of the set.  I think that it is more useful to indicate that this is
> the end of the series of frames.

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2016 09:32:18 UTC