Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4169)

> That would be true if the example was a header field, but it isn't.
> It is only talking about the field-value of the production, which already
> excludes the trailing whitespace of header-fields.
>
> So, the Errata is valid and the last example should not have trailing
> space at the end of the value.

...which is why we wanted to wait for your comments.  I'm off to mark
this "Verified" now.

Barry

Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 23:04:01 UTC