- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:22:57 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-06-24 07:42, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> ...
> 2) Maintenance
>>
>> - RFC 7238 ("The Hypertext Transfer Protocol Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)") from "experimental" to "proposed" (this wasn't a WG item)
>
> Do you want to give an update?
>
>
>> - RFC 5987 ("Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters") from "proposed" to "standard" (this wasn't a WG item) - see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-rfc5987bis-latest.html>
>
> Ditto.
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-rfc5987bis-07.html> -
the main issue is editorial; some parts need to be rewritten as the
httpbis specs do not have a common concept of parameter syntax anymore
(the same might be true for 2616, but that wasn't as clear).
> ...
>> 3) New stuff
>>
>> - "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Client-Initiated Content-Encoding" (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-cice-latest.html>)
>
> 15 minutes enough?
Update: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-cice-01.html>
> ...
>> - Header field syntax is something people continue to struggle with; maybe define how to use JSON in header fields to make things easier for new header field definitions
>
> Draft?
A sketch: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-jfv-00.html>
> ...
Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 08:23:40 UTC