------ Original Message ------ From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com> To: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>; "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>; "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Sent: 15/12/2013 08:41:00 Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt >On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Stephen Farrell ><stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: >> >>What that leaves unclear for me is how the current 30-40% of web >>sites that are setup for some form of TLS will suddenly become >>99%. Without some other action on helping sites get certs, it >>just won't happen would be my prediction. > >The ones who can’t/won’t deploy TLS stay with HTTP/1.1, that’s all. Or >am I missing something? Maybe you're missing the discussion we had about the futility/unacceptability of the "they can just use HTTP/1.1" argument. >
Received on Sunday, 15 December 2013 22:09:34 UTC