- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:40:25 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -------- In message <C6B30EDB-32FB-4093-AD74-4B596FC4F0D2@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >> I don't think this is good enough. >> >> You'd need ~20k of these frames a second to fill a 10GB ethernet, >> and a very large fraction of present day web-objects would require >> more than one frame already. > >Could you please spell out why you think that's a problem? As I said before: If we cannot demonstrate HTTP/2 on a 10GE media and argue plausibly that it can be handled on 1Tbit/sec, we're writing a standard for the past and not the future. Matt Mathis has been pushing similar agenda for IP MTU for years now: http://staff.psc.edu/mathis/MTU/ -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:40:48 UTC