- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:45:36 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <20120806083754.GB3961@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:11:35AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >2.0 client talks to 2.0 local proxy talking to 1.1 internet. >> >> That's not a terribly interesting use-case is it ? > >This use case should prevail in mobile environments. Your smartphone >should have an explicit proxy configured (instead of passing via an >interception proxy) that will also save it from round trips caused >by DNS requests. But is 1.1 vs. 2.0 proxy really going to make that much of a difference ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 08:46:03 UTC