- From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:07:51 +0100
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
tor 2012-03-01 klockan 11:34 +1300 skrev Adrien de Croy: > yeah I agree. Like CMS packages that take the easiest route to dealing > with potential caching issues instead of using good design. Even > revalidation is preferable to regeneration and retransmission. idempotence is not about caching at all. it's about safely being able to retry the exact same request when needed, resulting in the expected outcome. Regards Henrik
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:08:46 UTC