- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 11:17:05 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I'm inclined to establish the registry now, if it can be needed; otherwise it's effectively open season, and we're chartered to define extensibility, after all. I'll work on a proposal. Cheers, On 29/11/2011, at 7:41 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-11-29 05:33, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/274> >> >> I think we have two options here: >> >> 1) establish a warn-code registry >> 2) disallow definition of further warn-codes (i.e., deprecate extensibility here) >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Regards, > > We haven't seen any serious attempt to define a new warn code yet. (there was one misguided attempt, as far as I recall). > > I +0 on deprecating; but one could also argue that it's bad enough not to add extensibility, but not bad enough for deprecation. > > If, at some point in the future, a really good use case for a new Warn code comes up, we still can define a registry. But that's a big "if". > > Best regards, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 3 December 2011 00:17:40 UTC