Re: issue 79: must understand content-* header fields or fail

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

>
> My proposal is to remove that sentence from the spec and
> note in the changes section that the requirement was removed
> in favor of deploying PATCH.


I would tend to agree with this sentiment and have already identified a
number of areas where PATCH would be useful (and where patchy support for
Content-* would cause more problems than anything else).

Sam