- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:04:34 -0400
- To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 04/04/2016 05:10 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:52 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> >> We did clarify the wording on how unresolveable percentages fall >> into case B, to help make the percentage situation clearer: >> https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/342ac9d5c892 >> >> Hopefully that helps. Let us know if that works, or if we can >> do anything else to make this clearer. > > Thanks for the update, that helps. Two thoughts: > - Instead of ['flex-basis' becomes ''content''.], maybe say [the used > value for 'flex-basis' is "content".]? Done. > - To clarify, in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#algo-main-item > "or depends on its available size" is meant to catch min-content et > al? (by the way, what about fill-available, is that definite?) No, min-content et al. are intrinsic sizes and don't depend on the available size. fill-available and fit-content depend on the available size. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 22:05:12 UTC