- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:30:21 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, divya manian <divya.manian@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Aug 3, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> So one thing I don't understand about this proposed use of >> inset shadow, illustrated at >> <http://dl.dropbox.com/u/952/pola/index.html>, is why the >> background-image is dimmed out at all. >> >> The inset shadow goes from fully opaque at the edges of the >> "hole", to fully transparent over most of the hole (by some >> distance related to the blur radius from the edge). So, >> outside the influence of the shadow, the background-image >> should be fully revealed. Why is it dimmed out? > > Because it's a different image. The one on the left is pola.jpg, the > one on the right is pola-trans.jpg. I'm asking about the desired effect, not specifically how it's illustrated by <http://dl.dropbox.com/u/952/pola/index.html>. Simon
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2010 18:31:11 UTC