Re: Request for expressions of interest: revisiting the Geolocation API to make it promise compatible from Marcos Caceres on 2016-09-05 (public-geolocation@w3.org from September 2016)

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 20:08:26 -0700
To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>, "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAwChxPWy2L656D_1=pbwN=AHkCydU8DHtCU55yu7LKpG09dCA@mail.gmail.com>

On September 5, 2016 at 1:05:34 PM, Marcos Caceres (w3c@marcosc.com) wrote:
> > b) Should there be additional features/requirements added to the Geoloc. API? For
> instance, > we had considered in the group at one time as to whether a hard requirement
> for secure contexts > was necessary.

Actually, we could do "yes" on this.

Received on Monday, 5 September 2016 03:08:54 UTC