- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:32:53 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>, Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Rigo, Same horse. I do hope that you go back to the IRC logs of the f2f, and the email threads over the last 8 months. I listed about 8 reasons why (specially) geopriv was a bad idea for the web. This optional attribute smells alot like the same idea. Henning, railroaded? really? I think we had just about every major UA say that this was a bad idea -- based on decades of experience. I would think that browser hackers are the ones being railroaded if anyone! Doug Turner
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 21:35:39 UTC