W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: alignment-baseline and aligment-adjust properties

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:44:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30201B1F8D8@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Manuel Mall" <mm@arcus.com.au>, <xsl-editors@w3.org>

It turns out it might not be as simple as some missing
or extra values.  At least some SG members believe it
is more complicated than just an editorial oversight.

Since this wording comes from XSL 1.0, we plan to
process it as an erratum to 1.0 and fold it into
1.1 when it is ready.  Given that this is a 1.0
erratum and not a new 1.1 issue, We do not plan 
to hold up the XSL 1.1 CR for this issue.  We do
expect to be able to fold in the resolution of this
erratum before 1.1 becomes a Rec.

paul

Paul Grosso for the XSL FO SG 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xsl-editors-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:xsl-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Mall
> Sent: Wednesday, 2005 September 28 5:24
> To: xsl-editors@w3.org
> Subject: alignment-baseline and aligment-adjust properties
> 
> 
> This comment applies to the current spec as well as the current draft.
> 
> Both, the alignment-baseline and aligment-adjust properties 
> refer in their
> descriptions to the values "top", "bottom", "text-top", and 
> "text-bottom".
> However, in their actual definitions these values are not 
> included. I assume
> this is an editorial oversight or am I missing something?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Manuel
> 
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 21:44:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:58 GMT