W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > July to September 2005

Two content model concerns for 1.1 WD

From: Glen Mazza <grm7793@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20050701164337.72355.qmail@web81906.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: xsl-editors@w3.org


I had two content model concerns that may have been
miscategorized as editorial in nature.  I have not
seen any correction in the latest WD, and want to make
sure that indeed the new CM's are what is actually
desired for 1.1.

1.) (#62 of my previous comment list)  The CM for
fo:simple-page-master changed from 1.0 to 1.1 to allow
for multiple fo:region-bodies:

1.0 --

1.1 --

I'm not seeing what multiple fo:region-bodies for an
fo:s-p-m are providing in 1.1, or why the SG moved to
this for the new model.  Is it related to the new
fo:flow-maps?  I would appreciate "enlightenment" from
anyone here--not necessarily the SG--as I'm quite
curious as to the purpose of multiple fo:region-bodies
in 1.1!

2.) (#74 of my previous comment list)  In accomodating
the new fo:flow-map within the fo:layout-master-set,
it appears that the new CM is inadvertently now making
simple-page-masters/page-sequence-masters optional.  I
don't think that this was the intention of the SG, and
so I would like the editors to check this again:

1.0 -- (simple-page-master|page-sequence-master)+

1.1 --

i.e., it is no longer necessary for an fo:l-m-s to
have an fo:s-p-m or a fo:p-s-m--one fo:flow-map will

If this was not the intention, it appears switching
the 1.1 CM to something like


or, adding a prose statement after the CM declaring it
an error for a fo:layout-master-set not to have at
least one fo:s-p-m or fo:p-s-m would clarify this

Many thanks!

Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 16:50:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:24 UTC