W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: XSL 1.1 WD comment: The properties which may be attached to an F O.

From: Peter B. West <pbwest@powerup.com.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:56:03 +1000
Message-ID: <40071A83.80200@powerup.com.au>
To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Cc: "Mazza, Glen R., ,CPMS" <glen.mazza@cpms.osd.mil>, "'xsl-editors@w3.org'" <xsl-editors@w3.org>

Paul Grosso wrote:
> At 19:36 2004 01 14 -0500, Mazza, Glen R., ,CPMS wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hello, I'm Glen Mazza of Electronic Data Systems and of the XML Apache FOP
>>Project.
> 
> 
> Thanks for your input.  The XSL FO subgroup will be considering all
> comments in the formulation of our next draft.
> 
> I've got some comments just from myself (not the group) embedded below.
> 
...
> 
> There is nothing non-conformant about an XSL FO tree that
> has any property on any FO, but if a non-inheritable property
> appears on an FO to which it doesn't apply, it will have no
> effect--since "applying (to an FO)" is equivalent to "having 
> an effect (for that FO)".  The reason it makes sense to put
> an inheritable property on an FO to which it doesn't apply
> is that such a property may be applicable to a descendant
> FO which will inherit the value.

Paul,

What about from-parent() & from-nearest-specified-value() ?

Peter
-- 
Peter B. West <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 18:02:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:49 UTC