- From: Peter B. West <pbwest@powerup.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:56:03 +1000
- To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: "Mazza, Glen R., ,CPMS" <glen.mazza@cpms.osd.mil>, "'xsl-editors@w3.org'" <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Paul Grosso wrote: > At 19:36 2004 01 14 -0500, Mazza, Glen R., ,CPMS wrote: > > >>Hello, I'm Glen Mazza of Electronic Data Systems and of the XML Apache FOP >>Project. > > > Thanks for your input. The XSL FO subgroup will be considering all > comments in the formulation of our next draft. > > I've got some comments just from myself (not the group) embedded below. > ... > > There is nothing non-conformant about an XSL FO tree that > has any property on any FO, but if a non-inheritable property > appears on an FO to which it doesn't apply, it will have no > effect--since "applying (to an FO)" is equivalent to "having > an effect (for that FO)". The reason it makes sense to put > an inheritable property on an FO to which it doesn't apply > is that such a property may be applicable to a descendant > FO which will inherit the value. Paul, What about from-parent() & from-nearest-specified-value() ? Peter -- Peter B. West <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 18:02:32 UTC