Regarding your comment about the <uri-specification> datatype on xsl-editors

Eric,

Thank you for your comment to xsl-editors@w3.org archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002OctDec/0031


The following is our disposition of your above comment:

---

Disposition: Explanation of XSL spec

No the erratum is correct. The quotes around the "string" are 
optional and have been left out in the example. The enclosing 
single quotes ensure that the value is interpreted as a string 
literal by the expression language. Note that "url" is not a 
function, but a piece of syntax borrowed from CSS2.

---

Please Reply (cc-ing xsl-editors@w3.org) if you wish to make
an objection to our resolution.

Thank you for your interest in XSL.

Paul Grosso for the XSL FO Subgroup of the XSL WG