W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > October to December 2002

Tables Don't Respect Reference Orientation--why?

From: W. Eliot Kimber <eliot@isogen.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 10:43:30 -0600
Message-ID: <3DC7F532.7060405@isogen.com>
To: xsl-editors@w3.org

I notice that the spec says that only writing mode determines the cell 
and row progression order. I'm wondering why this is--I can't 
immediately think of any reason that tables shouldn't be rotatable just 
as any other reference area is--that is, the interaction of writing-mode 
with reference-orientation seems no more complex in a table context than 
in a multi-column page context, for example.

Have I missed some hidden complexity?


W. Eliot Kimber, eliot@isogen.com
Consultant, ISOGEN International

1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240
Austin, TX  78752 Phone: 512.656.4139
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 11:43:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:22 UTC