At 16:02 2002 10 02 +0100, DPawson@rnib.org.uk wrote: >Paul wrote: >> The XSL WG has added another property to correct this issue. >> >> Erratum, Section 7.16: >> >> Add: > ... snip > >What's the procedure please. >Will such errata be collated and posted to the w3c website, >or kept under wraps until the next WD? Quoting from the top of the same message: >We are in the process of >publishing the Errata document and expect it to go public in >2-3 weeks (sorry, it takes that long to do such things; for >those with W3C member access, a draft Errata document is at >http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/Group/2002/05/FO-errata ). By the way, I posted my response with the wrong subject (sigh, rushing to get it out before chairing another telcon). It should have been: Regarding your comment about space handling on xsl-editors Hopefully, this won't be too problematic for those trolling the archives. paulReceived on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 12:12:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 August 2007 00:11:36 GMT