Regarding your comment about inline building on xsl-editors

Peter,

Thank you for your comment to xsl-editors@w3.org archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002AprJun/0031

We determined that the spec required some corrections to address
your question.  We would appreciate it if you could let us know
if you feel that our proposed changes sufficiently address your
questions.

The following is our proposed disposition of your above comment:

---

We propose the following corrections to the spec:

1. the "Areas" portion of 6.9.2 [fo:basic-link] be changed from:


  The fo:basic-link formatting object generates one or more normal
  inline-areas.  The fo:basic-link returns these areas, any
  page-level-out-of-line areas, and any reference-level-out-of-line
  areas returned by the children of the fo:basic-link.

to:

  The fo:basic-link formatting object generates one or more normal
  inline-areas.  The fo:basic-link returns these areas,
  together with any normal block-areas,
  page-level-out-of-line areas, and reference-level-out-of-line
  areas returned by the children of the fo:basic-link.


2. The same changes should be made to 6.6.2 [fo:bidi-override] and 6.6.7
  [fo:inline], which have the same difficulty.


3. In section 4.7.3 [Inline-building] the following phrase
   (that describes the subject of the ordering constraints):

  the normal and/or anchor inline-areas
  returned by the child formatting objects,

should be changed to:

  the normal and/or anchor inline-areas
  and normal block-areas
  returned by the child formatting objects,

---

Please Reply (cc-ing xsl-editors@w3.org) if you wish to make
an objection to our resolution.

Thank you for your interest in XSL.

Paul Grosso for the XSL FO Subgroup of the XSL WG

Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 19:41:05 UTC