W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > July to September 2002

Regarding your comment on xsl-editors

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 18:09:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020630170415.017cd1f0@172.27.10.30>
To: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org




Thank you for your comment to xsl-editors@w3.org archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002JanMar/0145

The XSL WG is going through the comments at this time, developing
errata and lists of items to consider for a future version of XSL.

The following is our disposition of your above comment:

---
Disposition: Accepted (bug in spec)

Yes the example is wrong.

Erratum, Section 6.6.1.1.2:

Replace:

in XSL stylesheet: <fo:external-graphic src="{@image}"/>

with

<fo:external-graphic src="'url({@image})'"/> 

Replace:

fo: element and attribute tree: <fo:external-graphic src="TH0317A.jpg"/>

with

<fo:external-graphic src="'url(TH0317A.jpg)'"/>


>Should I be telling my students it is mandatory?


Disposition: Explanation of XSL spec

Yes!
---

Please Reply (cc-ing xsl-editors@w3.org) if you wish to make
an objection to our resolution.

Thank you for your interest in XSL.

Paul Grosso for the XSL FO Subgroup of the XSL WG 
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 12:13:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:53 GMT