W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: The need for url() syntax for <uri-specification>

From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:22:37 -0000
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F024A737A@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: xsl-editors@w3.org
Ken said:
> Looking at XSLFO 7.28.7, the src= property value is 
> <uri-specification>.
> 
> Looking at 5.11 <uri-specification> explicitly includes the 
> syntax "url(" 
> and other associated characters.

> I've noted XSLFO manufacturers to not appear to require the 
> "url()" syntax.


Perhaps tag 'ish, but SVG has the same problems.
Sometimes the url is required

<rect ..
   style='fill:url(#id-value)' />

other times not

  <use xlink:href='#id-value' .../>

Seems like its not fixed either way.

Personal view, keep it uniform, not bothered either way.


Regards DaveP 

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to
find out all about it.
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 04:23:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:52 GMT