W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: xslt2 issues

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:01:28 GMT
Message-Id: <200201041501.PAA22084@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: DPawson@rnib.org.uk
CC: xsl-editors@w3.org
> The rationale here, 'Java is better than XSLT', is something I would
> argue with. That is probably fine for Jeni T, I don't think it is 
> right to say it is 'best' for everybody.

It's not java vs xslt, it's built in rather than not. (eg MSXML
includes built in functions which are, I assume, written in C++,
I don't know and don't care what they are written in, but if I call a
function msxsl:xxx() Then i want to get microsofts version not some xslt
approximation. However i may still want to define msxsl:xxx() as an xslt
user defined function so the stylesheet will work elsewhere. If I wanted
to be sure that my own function was used on all implementations
including microsofts, i'd stick the function in a namespace starting
http://www.nag.co.uk.


> Though there are probably stylesheet author reasons why, say,
> the exslt:something or other isn't quite right for him/her,

then define your own function. But if you do that you shouldn't put it
in the exslt namespace, so the issue of name clashes is moot.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 10:02:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:52 GMT