- From: Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:01:19 +0000
- To: xsl-editors@w3.org
The use of the master-name property within
fo:simple-page-master , fo:page-sequence-master and fo:page-sequence
I find very confusing.
Within fo:single-page-master-reference you specify master-name, but
element indicates its a reference, not a 'name' or identifier.
For the previous 3 elements, I'm not sure if each is a reference or
an identifier.
I would find it far more helpful if the property were changed to
clearly indicate to users that the first two are idenfiers,
and in the third case its a reference, perhaps by changing the
property name to master-name-reference. If this is done, the practice
could be made common by renaming the master-name property in the sub-sequence
elements of page-sequence-master.
E.g.
<fo:page-sequence-master master-name="master-sequence">
<fo:single-page-master-reference
master-name-reference="first"/>
<fo:repeatable-page-master-reference
master-name-reference="red"
maximum-repeats="10"/>
<fo:repeatable-page-master-reference
master-name-reference="green"
maximum-repeats="no-limit"/>
</fo:page-sequence-master>
Then fo:page-sequence would read
<fo:page-sequence
master-page-reference="master-sequence"
Its difficult enough to understand without adding to the complexity
by misleading readers with poorly named properties.
Regards DaveP
AC, RNIB.
Received on Saturday, 23 December 2000 06:02:48 UTC