W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: XSLT 1.0: xsl:apply-imports when there is no overridden rule

From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 12:37:38 +0700
Message-ID: <3A2F2222.A8A9385F@jclark.com>
To: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@icl.com>
CC: "'xsl-editors@w3.org'" <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Kay Michael wrote:

> > > Section 5.6 says that "A template rule that is being used to override a
> > > template rule in an imported stylesheet can use <xsl:apply-imports>"; it
> > > does not say what happens if there is no such overridden rule.
> >
> > Section 5.8 says: "The built-in template rules are treated as if they
> > were imported implicitly before the stylesheet".  So the correct
> > behaviour is to invoke the built-in template rule.
> I agree that invoking the built-in template rule is probably the right
> behavior. However, I don't agree that the current spec clearly implies this.
> 5.6 says that the only rules considered are those "imported into the
> stylesheet element containing the current template rule", while 5.8 uses the
> phrase "imported implicitly before the stylesheet". Neither "imported into"
> nor "imported before" is formally defined, and it certainly isn't obvious
> that one implies the other. In 5.8 the phrase "the stylesheet" can only be
> read as meaning the whole stylesheet tree, not any particular "stylesheet
> element" (what I prefer to call a stylesheet module), so one could well
> argue that the built-in rules do NOT appear in the subtree rooted at the
> stylesheet module containing the current template rule (which is my reading
> of "imported into").

OK.  I take your point.  I'll record this as a problem.

Received on Thursday, 7 December 2000 00:57:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:21 UTC