W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: extension-element-available()

From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@icl.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:18:43 +0100
Message-ID: <93CB64052F94D211BC5D0010A800133170F12D@wwmess3.bra01.icl.co.uk>
To: "'James Clark'" <jjc@jclark.com>
Cc: "'xsl-editors@w3.org'" <xsl-editors@w3.org>
>I might do:
> 
> <!ATTLIST xt:document
>   xsl:extension-element-prefixes NMTOKEN #FIXED "xt"
> >
> 
But that raises a pretty paradox. If such a declaration makes "document" an
extension element, then the xsl:extension-element-prefixes is not present on
a literal result element, and therefore is not effective.

Mike Kay

PS: Another question has arisen in implementing
extension-function-available() and extension-element-available(). Should
these return true or false if the name supplied is a system-defined
function/element?

E.g. what is the result of extension-function-available("string")? 
Received on Friday, 1 October 1999 07:19:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:49 GMT