W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > April to June 1999

RE: Overloaded URIs must GO!

From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 20:40:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Cc: "XML List" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>, <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <14159.14148.356604.263593@localhost.localdomain>
Didier PH Martin writes:

 > David, I participated to the URN elaboration within IETF auspices. If you go
 > the IETF official RFC repository you'll find that the RFC 2141 defining URNs
 > is posted since already at least more than a year. So URNs are as real as
 > XML is and because it is the byproduct of IETF probably created in a more
 > democratic way than XML itself. Also, an other RDF has been created to
 > specify how URNs are resolved with DNS. Bottom line there is an
 > authoritative specification: RFC 2141.

The problem is that there are no authoritative specifications for any
URN namespaces except the IETF one.  If I wanted to use a URN for an
XML Namespace today, how would I construct it without using an x-* URN
namespace?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/
Received on Friday, 28 May 1999 20:41:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:49 GMT