- From: Christophe Marchand <cmarchand@oxiane.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:47:23 +0100
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
+1 ! Le 31/12/2016 à 18:41, Achim Berndzen a écrit : > Am 17.12.2016 um 15:44 schrieb Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>: >> Achim Berndzen <achim.berndzen@xml-project.com> writes: >>> I see. May be I will find the time to move some of them by hand, i.e. >>> raising an issue with the text of the 1.0 issue in the 1.1 repo. Would >>> that help or does it lead to confusion? >> From the “working on 1.1” perspective, I think that’d be an >> improvement. However, it will disassociate the comment from the >> original submitter and if there’s a comment trail, that’ll have to be >> summarized. >> > I have copies automatically generated (using XProc of course) summaries of the open issues of the xproc 1.0 repo to the 1.1 repo. > Every issue starts with „Legacy from 1.0“. > > As they are „auto-generated“ there may be some problems with the code tags and whitespace. Will check it the other day. > One table in one of Gerrit’s posts (1.0/specification/issue/160) didn’t make it. Will fix this the other day also. > > Greetings from Germany, > Achim > > ------------------------------------------------ > Achim Berndzen > achim.berndzen@xml-project.com > > http://www.xml-project.com > >
Received on Sunday, 1 January 2017 17:47:59 UTC