W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > January 2016

Re: newbie question on p:validate-with-xml-schema

From: Kraetke, Martin, le-tex <martin.kraetke@le-tex.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:39:46 +0100
To: David Levy <dml.public@sbcglobal.net>, xproc-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <569CB2E2.1060704@le-tex.de>
Hi,

You can use p:serialization to control the serialization of certain 
output documents. With the option omit-xml-declaration, you can choose 
whether to keep or omit the XML declaration. The default is to produce 
no XML declaration. A simple example pipeline is attached.

Kind regards,

Martin

-- 
Martin Kraetke
Lead Content Engineer
le-tex publishing services GmbH

Weissenfelser Str. 84, 04229 Leipzig, Germany
Phone +49 341 355356 143, Fax +49 341 355356 543
martin.kraetke@le-tex.de, http://www.le-tex.de

Registergericht / Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Leipzig
Registernummer / Registration Number: HRB 24930

Geschäftsführer: Gerrit Imsieke, Svea Jelonek,
Thomas Schmidt, Dr. Reinhard Vöckler

Am 11.01.2016 um 18:23 schrieb David Levy:
> Hello,
>
> I have just begun experimenting with Xproc with reasonable success after a
> first day.
>
> I did have one question and I hope I'm not embarrassing myself. When I
> submit an XML document to p:validate-with-xml-schema, the output omits the
> XML prolog:
>
> 	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
>
> causing some (easily-solved) issues in downstream processing. Or I can just
> pass the input to p:validate-with-xml-schema to downstream steps and ignore
> its output.
>
> But I wonder. Is this intended behavior? Is there an easy way to have
> p:validate-with-xml-schema include the prolog in its output?
>
> With thanks,
>
> David Levy
>
>
>


Received on Monday, 18 January 2016 09:40:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 18 January 2016 09:40:24 UTC