Re: PipX, a portable library of XProc pipelines and steps

Great!

Would you prefer if the steps are moved to some PipX namespacing regime or
are any namespace fine?

I think the main obstacle to using PipX in other projects are how easily it
can be integrated into other build processes.


Jostein


On 17 February 2014 15:45, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote:

>   Hi,
>
>   As promised to some of you in Prague last weekend, I have eventually
> created a GitHub repository for PipX, in order to ease collaboration
> on the library.  PipX is aimed at being a general purpose library for
> XProc.  It is different from EXProc, because it does not define any
> extension.  The goal is to gather existing XProc steps, written in
> standard XProc, and build a standard library for all those tools you
> found yourself writing and again and again.
>
>   For now, there is no step yet, so this is really a call for
> collaboration, rather than announcing a read-to-use library.  If you
> have interesting, generic enough steps somewhere in your codebase,
> feel free to share them!  For more information:
>
>     http://pipx.org/
>     https://github.com/fgeorges/pipx
>
>   Regards,
>
> --
> Florent Georges
> http://fgeorges.org/
> http://h2oconsulting.be/
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 09:01:04 UTC