- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:56:47 +0100
- To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi, Wouldn't it be better (and simpler) to use static-base-uri() instead? (if your processor is XPath 2.0-aware) Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/ On 7 December 2014 at 01:57, Liam R E Quin wrote: > I noticed that I can use p:in-scope-names to generate a document whose base URi is that of the containing pipeline, so is the easiest way, > > <p:in-scope-names name="in-scope-names" /> > <p:variable name="pipeline-uri" select="base-uri(/)"> > <p:pipe step="in-scope-names" port="result" /> > </p:variable> > > ? > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ >
Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 11:57:34 UTC