W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Proposed steps: pxp:gunzip and pxp:gzip

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:43:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CADyR_r095jgjkyvC88DgxrgCy_sh4e17=N4y0X=bQe4b4jarWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On 28 January 2013 17:53, Norman Walsh wrote:


> So your preference would be a pxp:archive step that could perform gzip,
> compress, bzip2, etc. and a pxp:unarchive step that did the reverse?

  I am not the biggest fan of that approach, but it is also the one
followed by the editors of the EXPath Archive module (to replace the
ZIP module):


  It has the benefit of being able to attach the format to the archive
descriptor, as data.


Florent Georges
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 08:44:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:10 UTC