W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Memory problem with sequences in Calabash

From: QuiXProc XProc <quixproc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:47:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMUtxrM=BejPfFW2pdNka=eXvndJFxGFTPkTeehQijgiVbjLnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
Cc: Conal Tuohy <conal.tuohy@versi.edu.au>, xproc-dev@w3.org
Great !

We're looking forward for your feedback

W.r.t. to you point on coverage please look at
http://tests.xproc.org/results/quixproc/

The QuiXProc Team


On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>wrote:

> That is good news. Last time I looked QuiXProc was still a rebuilt based
> on some version of Calabash, this sounds like a large step forward.
>
>
>
> I’m going to put it on the top of my nice-things-to-look-at list.. J
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> *Van:* innovimax@gmail.com [mailto:innovimax@gmail.com] *Namens *QuiXProc
> XProc
> *Verzonden:* woensdag 14 november 2012 20:45
> *Aan:* Geert Josten
> *CC:* Conal Tuohy; xproc-dev@w3.org
>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: Memory problem with sequences in Calabash
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Conal,
>
> Quixproc might work as well, but not sure how well it covers the standard,
> nor whether it has any of the nice extensions Calabash provides, in case
> you are using any..
>
>
>
> QuiXProc is a rewrapping of Calabash 1.0.2-94 including parallel
> processing and streaming
>
>
>
> So in the worst case it can do exactly what Calabash can do.
>
>
>
> In best cases, it can handle more memory because of streaming
>
>
>
> Hope this helps
>
>
>
> QuiXProc Team
>
Received on Saturday, 17 November 2012 11:47:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 17 November 2012 11:47:31 GMT