W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > November 2012

Re: WG working on xproc requirements/use cases v2

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:26:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CADsXk-ZBvYQW6+rk7ucZ0CS5mQ4+-0Z7TZY0uzXwBzFrOpt2pQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Selwyn <chris@selwyn-family.me.uk>
Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Chris Selwyn <chris@selwyn-family.me.uk> wrote:
> And the one after that... what will it be called?
>
> "XProc: An XML Pipeline Language Version V.theoneafternext"
> or (confusingly)
> "XProc: An XML Pipeline Language Version V.next"
>
> ?

Its an important point that Chris brings up .. clearly v.next or
v.theoneafternext is not sustainable

I think its probably best just to wait until whatever WHAT WG does
with their spec and we slavishly emulate.

J
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2012 09:27:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 4 November 2012 09:27:06 GMT