W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > November 2012

Re: WG working on xproc requirements/use cases v2

From: Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:44:21 +0100
Message-ID: <5093B215.1070206@le-tex.de>
To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Speaking of centuries and numbers: shouldn’t we rename the century that 
we live in to “current century” instead of 21st? Or would you prefer 
“living century”?

On 2012-11-02 12:40, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 2.11.2012 12:23, Norman Walsh wrote:
>> Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl> writes:
>>
>>> Shouldn't we name this XProc v3?
>>
>> Numbers are so last century. We're going to switch to meaningful
>> names. The official name for the next release of XProc is going to be
>> "XProc: An XML Pipeline Language Version V.next".
>
> Hmm, probably I'm too late to party, but what about:
>
> XProc: Living XML Pipeline
>
> 				Jirka
>

-- 
Gerrit Imsieke
Geschäftsführer / Managing Director
le-tex publishing services GmbH
Weissenfelser Str. 84, 04229 Leipzig, Germany
Phone +49 341 355356 110, Fax +49 341 355356 510
gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de, http://www.le-tex.de

Registergericht / Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Leipzig
Registernummer / Registration Number: HRB 24930

Geschäftsführer: Gerrit Imsieke, Svea Jelonek,
Thomas Schmidt, Dr. Reinhard Vöckler
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 11:45:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 November 2012 11:45:20 GMT