- From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:53:54 -0400
- To: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- CC: xproc-dev@w3.org
Hi, On 5/20/2012 7:30 AM, Xmlizerwrote: > Why not using xsl:result-document and create a sequence that you could > get out of the p:xslt step ? That's more or less what I meant by this: > We may end up dropping our messages in as XML and then filtering > them into a separate "warnings" pipe. I imagine this is being done a > fair amount: is it more or less the recommendation when developers > want to use xsl:message to emit runtime warnings? Are there other > ideas I have missed? Cheers, Wendell -- ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 16:54:48 UTC