W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Non-primary port connection between non-contiguous steps

From: Dr. Yves Forkl (SRZ) <Y.Forkl@srz.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:55:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4FD06C78.4010603@srz.de>
To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Gerrit,

I agree with you. Context-dependent names for p:input etc. would have made this kind of misunderstanding impossible.

While we're at bashing the spec :-) : Within p:declare-step, having container elements that enclose p:input, p:output, p:option, p:log and p:serialization on the one hand and the remaining content on the other hand (which could have been named e.g. "head" and "body") would have made it much easier to hand-edit step declarations without inadvertently mixing up instances from both groups, at least in my experience.

Yves


Am 06.06.2012 13:25, schrieb Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex:
> Yves, you are not alone.
> This context dependence of p:input/p:output element semantics was hard for me to understand initially. Only after I had grasped it finally, I saw that there was indeed a kind of caveat in the spec:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#p.input
> Then I thought for some time that the *declaration* and the *connection* use of p:input should have been discerned by giving context-dependent names to the elements (e.g., p:declare-input and p:connect-input).
> I think it might facilitate things for new users. It will be interesting to learn about the input/output naming discussions from the spec editors.

--
Dr. Yves Forkl - Softwareentwicklung
SRZ, Bessemerstr. 83-91, 12103 Berlin
www.srz.de | Firmengruppe: www.besscom.de
tel +49 30 75301-335 | fax +49 30 75301-11335

Satz-Rechen-Zentrum Hartmann+Heenemann GmbH&Co. KG
Sitz Berlin | AG Charlottenburg | HRA 8089
Komplementärin Satz-Rechner-Betriebsgesellschaft mbH
Sitz Berlin | AG Charlottenburg | HRB 4905
Geschäftsführer: Walter Fock
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 08:55:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 June 2012 08:55:58 GMT