- From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:30:05 +0100
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Relaying the thanks to the others.. ;-) (bit unusual that a reply doesn't automatically go to the list, like with other lists..) -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com] Verzonden: woensdag 25 januari 2012 22:54 Aan: Geert Josten Onderwerp: Re: Aggregating results: hints wanted Geert, Thanks, this looks like exactly what I should be trying. (I knew it was going to be something like this. :-) Thanks to Gerrit also for the resources. And to David for his kind suggestion, even if -- in this case -- I have good non-technical reasons for using XProc. Cheers, Wendell On 1/25/2012 3:56 PM, Geert Josten wrote: > I think I would use p:wrap-sequence with multiple pipe bindings on its > input. You are aware that you can put multiple p:pipe elements inside a > p:input? ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 06:30:43 UTC