- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:18:32 +0100
- To: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On 21 November 2011 21:57, Geert Josten wrote: Hi, > You can put it just below your inputs, outputs and options as a > simple <ut:parameters name="params"/>. After that you have to > use a p:group, and declare p:variables at the top of that with > a <p:pipe step="params" port="parameters"/>. Yes, that's more or less what I had in mind too. The problem for a generic step is that you have to choose between a sequence or not for the primary input port (which is supposed to be the pass-through). Probably both ut:parameters and ut:parameters-seq would make sense then... Nice library of tools, BTW :-) Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 00:19:23 UTC