- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:11:19 +0100
- To: Hans-Juergen Rennau <rennau@bits-ac.com>
- Cc: "Christopher.R.Ball" <christopher.r.ball@gmail.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On 10 March 2011 10:17, Hans-Juergen Rennau wrote:
Hi,
> The template mechanism is fine, but it is a pity that it is
> only available as a step, not *directly* applicable to
> p:inline. Hence the extra step, bad readability and verbosity.
> What I would wish for were a template variant of p:inline,
> something like:
> <p:inline-template>
> <p:with-param name="..." select="..."/>
> <p:inline>
> <foo>{$bar}</foo>
> </p:inline>
> </p:inline-template>
I don't quite understand. What's the difference with the
following? :
<p:template>
<p:input port="template">
<p:inline>
<foo>{ $bar }</foo>
</p:inline>
</p:input>
<p:with-param name="bar" select="..."/>
</p:template>
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 10:12:12 UTC