W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > February 2011

RE: Document Template test cases

From: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:30:05 -0500
To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>
CC: <temp44@szm.sk>
Message-ID: <3799D0FD120AD940B731A37E36DAF3FE32B15AFF78@MX20A.corp.emc.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 9:43 PM
> To: XProc Dev
> Subject: Re: Document Template test cases
> 
> "vojtech.toman@emc.com" <vojtech.toman@emc.com> writes:
> > You are right that XPath 1.0-based processor will fail the test.
> > Rewriting the test to be XPath 1.0-based might fix this, but I
> > actually think that the essence of the test was testing that the
> > processor applies the correct XPath version (2.0 in this case) in
> > p:document-template. But I may be wrong. We would have to ask Norm
> > because he wrote the test.
> 
> I think I was just trying to test nested {{ and }}. I used string-join
> because it was the first thing that occurred to me. I'll change it to
> nested concat() calls when I get a chance.
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm

Done. The test template-003.xml now uses XPath 1.0.

Regards,
Vojtech


--
Vojtech Toman
Consultant Software Engineer
EMC | Information Intelligence Group
vojtech.toman@emc.com
http://developer.emc.com/xmltech
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 10:35:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 February 2011 10:35:36 GMT