W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Calabash: adding redundant namespaces to p:xslt ?

From: Manfred Staudinger <manfred.staudinger@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:10:32 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=5avw6XpPx6K+eNjrYhG2G16mvXSfYRfUxpeAy@mail.gmail.com>
To: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>
Cc: xproc-dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Romain,

Thanks for the pointer, works perfect!

Regards,

Manfred

On 16/09/2010, Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can use the XProc @exlude-inline-prefix attribute on the parent
> p:declare-step or p:pipeline or p:inline.
>
> This attribute is described in the spec in the p:inline element:
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#p.inline>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Romain.
>
> Le 16 sept. 10 à 01:01, Manfred Staudinger a écrit :
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Recently I wanted to add a p:xslt step to my pipeline and first tested
>> the stylesheet standalone. The input document has a c:file root with
>> elements in a prefixed namespace mixed with those in no-namespace. The
>> output should have the same root with some child elements in
>> no-namespace, nothing difficult. The stylesheet starts with:
>>   <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
>>      xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step"
>>      xmlns:dwf="DWF-Manifest:6.0"
>>      exclude-result-prefixes="dwf"
>>      xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
>> When I added the transformation to my pipeline, I found the output had
>> changed. Every child element had added three namespace declarations to
>> it:
>>      xmlns:cx="http://xmlcalabash.com/ns/extensions"
>>      xmlns:dwfx="http://schemas.dwf.autodesk.com/dwfx/2006/11"
>>      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>> which are declared on the pipeline root element (p:declare-step) but
>> not on the stylesheet nor its input document. To get rid of this
>> annoyance I had to specify
>>      exclude-result-prefixes="dwf cx dwfx xs"
>> but this makes the stylesheet invalid outside the xproc:
>>      XTSE0808: Namespace prefix cx has not been declared
>>
>> Is there a better way to handle this or to avoid the implicit
>> declaration of those namespaces altogether? (Using Calabash 0.9.22)
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Manfred
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 16 September 2010 11:11:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 16 September 2010 11:11:04 GMT