W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2010

RE: EXProc proposal: pxp:hmac-sha1 (and pxp:hmac-md5)

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 05:10:09 -0400
Message-ID: <997C307BEB90984EBE935699389EC41C016F6CFB@CORPUSMX70C.corp.emc.com>
To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>
> > I would probably better go for a p:hash extension for the moment but
not the
> > way it is proposed
> > * @algorithm=pxp:hmac_sha @version=1
> > * @param(key)= key
> > (see the pxp:hmac_sha instead of only pxp:hmac)
> 
>   Yes, I was also wondering why we had hmac here instead of hmac-sha.
> For what is worth, I would rather say pxp:hmac-sha, with an hyphen
> instead of an underscore.  That's consistent with the existing QName,
> and with the actual name of HMAC-SHA.

Looks good. I also prefer pxp:hmac-sha instead of using the underscore.

Regards,
Vojtech

--
Vojtech Toman
Principal Software Engineer
EMC Corporation
toman_vojtech@emc.com
http://developer.emc.com/xmltech
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 09:10:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 May 2010 09:10:55 GMT