W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2010

Re: EXProc proposal: pxp:hmac-sha1 (and pxp:hmac-md5)

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:06:29 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTin4s7pfeiXuG0OdilLgTUENcIHOWjp0kqMSrlFu@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM,  <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Fuller [mailto:james.fuller.2007@gmail.com]
>> I would stump up for just defining exproc:hmac-sha1 on the algorithm
>> option on existing p:hash instread of a new step? Afterall it is
>> defined as a Qname ... which does make me think of what namespace the
>> existing options are in ;)
> I was thinking about this, too, but my feeling is that would be twisting
> of p:hash. In my opinion, p:hash is an implementation of a hash
> function, whereas things like HMAC-SHA1 apply a hash function
> iteratively.

yes, but the nice thing about xproc steps is we don't *have* to map
them directly onto functions all the time ;) ... I think its natural
place to put it though we need to ensure we get the version option
defined as well for it.

Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 08:07:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:06 UTC