W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2010

Re: exproc implemented extensions

From: Claudius Teodorescu <claud108@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 11:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <559151.12810.qm@web112014.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
Hi,

Among these extensions would count some extensions I made for xprocxq? Jim Fuller knows about them and told me that he will think about a standardized way of including such extensions into xprocxq, but they are now working very nice for me just by writing them into  two files of xprocxq that are dedicated to extensions.

 Claudius Teodorescu
http://kuberam.ro




________________________________
From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 10:23:24 AM
Subject: exproc implemented extensions

On 22 April 2010 18:58, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote:
> On 22 April 2010 15:54, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>> Especially when I can read which processors implement which
>> extensions on exproc.org <grin/>
>
>  Maybe a good candidate for wiki.xproc.org, Dave?

http://wiki.xproc.org/Implementation

If implementors would kindly fill in the table,
indicating which extensions are implemented.


regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk


      
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:52:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:52:31 GMT