W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Default pipeline?

From: Tony Lavinio <tony@lavinio.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:05:05 -0500
Message-ID: <f6d9e2dc1003121805k140227r24a013b0107b628d@mail.gmail.com>
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Why not just "./default.xpl"? No complicated rules.


On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>wrote:

> make would only run Makefile if there weren't also "makefile," which if I
> recall correctly, has precedence.  I wouldn't recommend repeating that
> little convention, but maybe you could allow for a couple of different
> options here.
>
> -Mike
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of James Sulak
> > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:32 AM
> > To: Norman Walsh
> > Cc: XProc Dev
> > Subject: Re: Default pipeline?
> >
> > pipeline.xpl?
> >
> > -James
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> > > If you run "make" without a make file, it looks for "Makefile".
> > > If you run "ant" without a build file, it looks for "build.xml".
> > >
> > > If you run an XProc processor without specifying a
> > pipeline, should it
> > > look for a default pipeline. What should it be called?
> > >
> > >                                        Be seeing you,
> > >                                          norm
> > >
> > > --
> > > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The human race consists of the
> > > http://nwalsh.com/            | dangerously insane and such as are
> > >                              | not.--Mark Twain
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Tony Lavinio       DataDirect Technologies       alavinio@datadirect.com
High-performance XML Processor: DataDirect XQuery http://www.xquery.com/
EDI/Flat File<->XML Converters (Java|.Net) http://www.xmlconverters.com/
Received on Saturday, 13 March 2010 02:05:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 13 March 2010 02:06:00 GMT