W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > March 2010

RE: Default pipeline?

From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:39:40 -0500
Message-Id: <201003122334.o2CNYoEi018498@hades.falutin.net>
To: "'James Sulak'" <jsulak@gmail.com>, "'Norman Walsh'" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: "'XProc Dev'" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
make would only run Makefile if there weren't also "makefile," which if I
recall correctly, has precedence.  I wouldn't recommend repeating that
little convention, but maybe you could allow for a couple of different
options here.

-Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of James Sulak
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:32 AM
> To: Norman Walsh
> Cc: XProc Dev
> Subject: Re: Default pipeline?
> 
> pipeline.xpl?
> 
> -James
> 
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> > If you run "make" without a make file, it looks for "Makefile".
> > If you run "ant" without a build file, it looks for "build.xml".
> >
> > If you run an XProc processor without specifying a 
> pipeline, should it 
> > look for a default pipeline. What should it be called?
> >
> >                                        Be seeing you,
> >                                          norm
> >
> > --
> > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The human race consists of the 
> > http://nwalsh.com/            | dangerously insane and such as are
> >                              | not.--Mark Twain
> >
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 13 March 2010 00:40:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 13 March 2010 00:40:14 GMT