W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Default pipeline?

From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:30:14 +0000
Message-ID: <74a894af1003110730x67059193i20476f83f3a6bacd@mail.gmail.com>
To: David <dlee@calldei.com>
Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
I don't think you can go far wrong with:

"pipeline.xproc"

:)

On 11 March 2010 15:21, David <dlee@calldei.com> wrote:
> I doubt Norm is thinking this is something that belongs in the XProc spec.
>
> First off an implementation should recommend a suffix ...
> Since xproc pipelines are xml they could be
>    .xml
>
> why not ?
>
>
> But following the XSLT convention maybe
>    .xpl
>    .xproc
>    .xpipeline
>
> I think a lot of people are using .xpl but maybe an implementation should
> suggest something ?
>
> Once you decide on the prefered implementation suffix ...
> the "default pipeline" might be ...
>
>    xproc.<suffix.>
>    pipeline.<suffix>
>    standard input ....
> <implementation name>.<suffix>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------
> David A. Lee
> dlee@calldei.com
> http://www.calldei.com
> http://www.xmlsh.org
>
>
> On 3/11/2010 9:30 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Norman Walsh writes:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> If you run "make" without a make file, it looks for "Makefile".
>>> If you run "ant" without a build file, it looks for "build.xml".
>>>
>>> If you run an XProc processor without specifying a pipeline, should it
>>> look for a default pipeline. What should it be called?
>>>
>>
>> Maybe, but that's for implementations to document, not the spec. to
>> require.
>>
>> I would expect to configure the specific name in the
>> site-configuration for my pipeline processor, I guess.  That way it
>> could be absolute or relative. . .
>>
>> ht
>> - --         Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of
>> Edinburgh
>>                          Half-time member of W3C Team
>>       10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>>                 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>>                        URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged
>> spam]
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQFLmP6akjnJixAXWBoRApK7AJ4l8vcjECyBmKU746I/0znUxw4mWwCfbPiu
>> Ivn7LUijFXh2eIbLGrCQtAQ=
>> =WkBc
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 15:30:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 March 2010 15:30:49 GMT